The answer so far

In two large trials, high-dose beta-carotene supplements were linked to more lung cancers in groups at high risk; one trial tested beta-carotene and vitamin A together. These trials did not test carrots or other vegetables. People who smoke or used to smoke should check the exact ingredients of eye supplements and discuss a product with a healthcare professional.179

On this page
  1. Why were these supplements tested?
  2. ATBC: what happened among Finnish men who smoked?
  3. CARET: why was the second trial different?
  4. Does this mean carrots are dangerous?
  5. What if I smoke or used to smoke?
  6. Can a supplement prevent cancer?
  7. What should I check on a label?
  8. Sources
Follow this question
Beta-carotene, smoking and cancer: what two trials found Choose a step to explore this subject in more detail.
  1. 1Why were these supplements tested?
  2. 2ATBC: what happened among Finnish men who smoked?
  3. 3CARET: why was the second trial different?
  4. 4Does this mean carrots are dangerous?

Why were these supplements tested?

Researchers had observed that people eating more fruit and vegetables often had lower rates of lung cancer. That association did not prove beta-carotene caused the difference: diets, smoking and many other factors could differ too. Researchers therefore tested concentrated supplements in randomized trials. A trial can test a particular product and population; it cannot establish that a whole food has the same effect.58

ATBC: what happened among Finnish men who smoked?

ATBC randomly assigned 29,133 men aged 50–69 who smoked to beta-carotene (20 mg a day), vitamin E (50 mg a day), both, or placebo. These were study doses, not recommendations. The beta-carotene comparison combined men assigned it with or without vitamin E and compared them with those not assigned it. Over 5–8 years, lung cancer was diagnosed in 474 of 14,560 assigned beta-carotene (about 3.3%) and 402 of 14,573 not assigned it (about 2.8%). The original report found an 18% higher relative incidence with beta-carotene.

The approximately 0.5 percentage-point difference between those observed proportions is not the same as an 18 percentage-point increase. Follow-up time varied, and these are group results, not an individual forecast.12

Two trials, two different comparisonsNeither trial tested vegetables. The results describe groups, not a person's predicted risk.
  • ATBC · Finland · 1994Men who smoked: beta-carotene with or without vitamin E versus no beta-carotene. Lung cancer: 474 of 14,560 versus 402 of 14,573 during 5–8 years of follow-up.
  • CARET · United States · 1996Participants at high risk from smoking history or asbestos: beta-carotene plus preformed vitamin A versus placebo. The combination cannot isolate either ingredient's effect.

CARET: why was the second trial different?

CARET enrolled 18,314 US participants at high lung-cancer risk because of smoking history or asbestos exposure. It randomly assigned a combination of beta-carotene (30 mg a day) and preformed vitamin A as retinyl palmitate (25,000 IU a day), or placebo. These were study doses, not recommendations. After roughly four years on average, the lung-cancer incidence rate was 28% higher relative to placebo, and overall mortality was also higher. An evidence review reports 229 cases among 9,420 assigned the combination (2.4%) and 159 among 8,894 assigned placebo (1.8%); these observed proportions and the relative rate use different calculations. The intervention stopped early.

Because both nutrients were given together, CARET cannot tell us how much of the difference came from either ingredient alone. ATBC provides separate evidence about beta-carotene in men who smoked. Neither number predicts one person’s outcome.752

Does this mean carrots are dangerous?

No. These studies tested concentrated supplements, not carrots, leafy greens or ordinary meals. Beta-carotene in food is part of a food matrix, not a trial capsule; the trial results should not be turned into a warning against vegetables. On the other hand, the observational association that motivated the trials does not prove that any single food prevents cancer. See how plant pigments and preformed vitamin A differ.18

What if I smoke or used to smoke?

In its 2024 summary, the European Food Safety Authority advises people who smoke to avoid beta-carotene supplements; it could not set a tolerable upper intake level for beta-carotene because adequate data were lacking. An absence of a set limit does not establish a safe supplement amount. The US National Eye Institute advises current and former smokers to avoid the original beta-carotene-containing AREDS eye formula. See the difference between AREDS and AREDS2.

If a product was recommended for a diagnosed condition, check its exact ingredients and discuss alternatives with the clinician or pharmacist who advised it. Do not assume these historical trial doses establish a personal safe threshold.

What if I took one in the past? Researchers continued following CARET participants after the study supplements were stopped. Over six years of post-intervention follow-up, the estimated lung-cancer rate remained higher in the group originally assigned the combination, but the uncertainty interval included no difference. This does not establish that the risk disappeared, determine when it might change, or predict an individual outcome. CARET tested beta-carotene and retinyl palmitate together. If you are concerned, bring the product name, ingredients and approximate period of use to a clinician.4910

Can a supplement prevent cancer?

The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends against beta-carotene supplements for prevention of cancer or cardiovascular disease in community-dwelling, nonpregnant adults. This prevention recommendation does not cover treating a known deficiency. Quitting smoking lowers lung-cancer risk over time; a supplement is not a substitute. A healthcare professional can discuss support and, where appropriate, screening.36

What should I check on a label?

Some multivitamins and older eye formulas list beta-carotene as an ingredient or source of vitamin A. Names and formulations differ, so look at the actual ingredient panel and serving size. A regular supplement, a prescribed treatment for a deficiency, and a studied eye-disease formulation answer different questions. Bring the packaging and medicine list when asking for advice. Read how to interpret vitamin A labels or return to the vitamin A overview.49

Sources, kept close.

Selected supporting sources; this is not a complete literature review.

  1. The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on lung cancer and other cancers in male smokersATBC Cancer Prevention Study Group / New England Journal of Medicine · 1994 randomized trial; 29,133 male smokers aged 50–69 in FinlandAccess checked 2026-11-05 · Beta-carotene comparison pools assignment with and without vitamin E; 5–8 years follow-up; not a trial of vegetables.
  2. Beta carotene cancer results: evidence review appendix F table 12Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality / US Preventive Services Task Force evidence review · 2022 US systematic evidence review of cancer-prevention supplement trialsAccess checked 2026-11-05 · Reports ATBC 474/14,560 versus 402/14,573, combining vitamin E assignment arms. These are observed fractions, not a prediction for an individual.
  3. Vitamin and mineral supplementation to prevent cardiovascular disease and cancerUS Preventive Services Task Force · 2022 US preventive recommendation for community-dwelling nonpregnant adultsAccess checked 2026-11-05 · Prevention recommendation excludes people with known deficiencies and does not address treatment of an individual condition.
  4. Tolerable upper intake levels for vitamins and minerals: summary tablesEuropean Food Safety Authority · 2024 EU scientific summary including beta-carotene and preformed vitamin AAccess checked 2026-11-05 · The panel did not set a beta-carotene upper level for lack of adequate data; it advises smokers to avoid beta-carotene supplements.
  5. Lung cancer prevention: health professional versionUS National Cancer Institute · US evidence summary on smoking, trials and lung cancer preventionAccess checked 2026-11-05 · Summarizes population evidence; individual risk depends on smoking and other factors.
  6. Lung cancer risk factorsUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US public-health guidance, 18 May 2026Access checked 2026-11-05 · Describes smoking-related risk and benefit of quitting; not a supplement trial.
  7. Effects of a combination of beta carotene and vitamin A on lung cancer and cardiovascular diseaseNew England Journal of Medicine / PubMed · Randomised placebo-controlled prevention trial; United States; 1996Accessed 2026-11-04
  8. Antioxidants and Cancer PreventionU.S. National Cancer Institute · Official research evidence summary; United StatesAccessed 2026-11-04
  9. AREDS and AREDS2 clinical trialsNational Eye Institute · US government trial overview and formulation table, updated 22 October 2025Access checked 2026-11-05 · Summarizes specific products and disease stages; recommendations may differ by jurisdiction.
  10. The Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial: incidence of lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality during 6-year follow-up after stopping beta-carotene and retinol supplementsJournal of the National Cancer Institute / PubMed · Post-intervention follow-up of randomized trialAccess checked 2026-11-06 · Source date: 2004 · Follow-up after a trial of beta-carotene plus retinyl palmitate in people at high lung-cancer risk; post-intervention lung-cancer estimate includes no difference and cannot predict an individual outcome or isolate either ingredient.